3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte Consolidated Pub. Co., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte Consolidated Pub. Co., Inc. Anchor | green | “897 so.2d at 291 -92 (quoting ex parte dillard dep't stores, inc. , 879 so.2d 1134 , 1136-37 (ala. 2003) ).” | 4 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. | green | “in ex parte norfolk southern ry. , 897 so.2d 290 (ala. 2004), this court delineated the limited circumstances under which review of a discovery order is available by a petition for a writ of mandamus and the standard for that review in light of ex parte ocwen federal bank, fsb ,…” | 4 |
| 3 | Ex Parte Coosa Valley Health Care, Inc. | green | “the burden of proving that a privilege exists and proving the prejudicial effect of disclosing the information is on the party asserting the privilege” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.