2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hurst v. Florida.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hurst v. Florida Anchor | green | “required the judge alone to find the existence of an aggravating circumstance.” | 7 |
| 2 | Duke v. State | green | “that the jury unanimously find the existence of an aggravating circumstance in order to make the defendant death-eligible.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.