3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re CJ.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re CJ Anchor | green | “the 'best interests' standard, in this context, is less protective of parents' visitation rights than the 'grave threat' standard.” | 4 |
| 2 | In Re CB | green | “the 'best interests' standard, in this context, is less protective of parents' visitation rights than the 'grave threat' standard” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.