2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Deborah Spangenberg v. David Kolakowski.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deborah Spangenberg v. David Kolakowski Anchor | green | “our courts have interpreted this statute to require a party who seeks modification to prove 'changed circumstances.” | 8 |
| 2 | Morris v. Morris | green | “with full knowledge of all present and reasonably foreseeable future circumstances bargained for a fixed payment or established the criteria for payment, . . . irrespective of circumstances that in the usual case would give rise to lepis modifications of their agreement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.