2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from FNFS, Ltd. v. Harwood (In Re Harwood).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FNFS, Ltd. v. Harwood (In Re Harwood) Anchor | green | “both involve intentional conduct intended to create or foster a false impression.” | 7 |
| 2 | Wright v. Minardi (In re Minardi) | green | “involves an express statement, while a claim of false pretenses may be premised on misleading conduct without an explicit statement.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.