2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re I.S..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re I.S. Anchor | green | “it was within the court's province, as fact-finder, to determine the weight and credibility to be afforded to evidence.” | 6 |
| 2 | In Re Scott S. | green | “the termination hearing focused, as it should, not on the original reason for the children's removal from the parents' home, but on the parents' actions since that time and their ability, contemporaneous with the termination hearing and into the future, to provide safe care for …” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.