2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Eshbach v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eshbach v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Anchor | green | “thus, a determination of what amounts to willful misconduct requires a consideration of all of the circumstances, including the reasons for the employee's noncompliance with the employer's directives.” | 8 |
| 2 | Waverly Heights, Ltd. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review | green | “where an employer seeks to deny uc benefits based on a work-rule violation, the employer must prove the existence of a work rule, the reasonableness of the rule and the employee's violation of the rule.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.