3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lambert v. Estren.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lambert v. Estren Anchor | green | “however, in the event no such representative exists, an appropriate appointment may be made by the supreme court and that individual may be substituted in place of the decedent” | 4 |
| 2 | Dieye v. Royal Blue Services, Inc. | green | “the supreme court is a court of general jurisdiction with the power to appoint a temporary administrator, and may do so to avoid delay and prejudice in a pending action” | 4 |
| 3 | Rosenfeld v. Hotel Corp. of America | green | “the determination whether to exercise its authority to appoint a temporary administrator is addressed to the broad discretion of the supreme court” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.