4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 80 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Roy Brown v. Linda Matauszak.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roy Brown v. Linda Matauszak Anchor | green | “a court cannot create a claim which has not spelled out in his pleading.” | 27 |
| 2 | Eric Martin v. William Overton | green | “iberal construction does not require a court to conjure allegations on a litigant's behalf.” | 25 |
| 3 | Roy Brown v. Linda Matauszak | green | “court cannot create a claim which has not spelled out in his pleading.” | 24 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.