7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 94 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chaudhary v. Department of Human Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chaudhary v. Department of Human Services Anchor | green | “evidence is clear and convincing if it leaves no reasonable doubt in the mind of the trier of fact as to the truth of the proposition in question.” | 49 |
| 2 | Rowe v. Raoul | green | “safety, accountability, fairness, and equity-today (safe-t) act.” | 15 |
| 3 | People v. Ruhl | green | “performs the same analysis that the trial court would perform using the proper standards.” | 9 |
| 4 | People v. Romine | green | “dangerousness and conditions of release are two sides of the same coin; the nature and severity of the threat necessarily determine the nature and severity of the conditions that could-or could not-mitigate the threat.” | 7 |
| 5 | People v. Inman | green | “rule 604(h) requires the notice of appeal to include a description of the relief to be requested "and the grounds for the relief requested.” | 6 |
| 6 | People v. Craig | green | “more than a preponderance of the evidence and not quite approaching the beyond-a- reasonable-doubt standard necessary to convict a person of a criminal offense.” | 5 |
| 7 | People v. Craig | green | “if any, will reasonably ensure the appearance of a defendant as required or the safety of any other person or the community and the likelihood of compliance by the defendant with all the conditions of pretrial release.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.