2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Buckles v. Buckles.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buckles v. Buckles Anchor | green | “to the extent feasible, each party should enjoy, after termination of a marriage, a standard of living comparable to that established during the marriage as adjusted by the various factors of r.c. 3105.18.” | 8 |
| 2 | Layne v. Layne | green | “consider all of the relevant factors in r.c. 3105.18 then weigh the need for support against the ability to pay.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.