2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of Oakland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of Oakland Anchor | green | “a condition requiring compliance with regulations is a common and reasonable mitigation measure, and may be proper where it is reasonable to expect compliance.” | 7 |
| 2 | Sierra Club v. County of Fresno | green | “mitigation measures need not include precise quantitative performance standards, but they must be at least partially effective, even if they cannot mitigate significant impacts to less than significant levels.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.