3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dobra v. Commissioner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dobra v. Commissioner Anchor | green | “bring themselves within the clear scope of the exclusion.” | 5 |
| 2 | Dobra v. Commissioner | green | “within the clear scope of the exclusion” | 3 |
| 3 | Stine v. United States | neutral | “a rating disparity between the two systems is not unusual because of the differing standards that must be applied.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.