3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Waggoner v. U.S. Bancorp.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Waggoner v. U.S. Bancorp Anchor | green | “does not generally consider the merits of claims, resolve factual disputes, or evaluate credibility.” | 4 |
| 2 | Castillo v. Morales, Inc. | green | “within the discretion of the trial court.” | 4 |
| 3 | Myers v. Marietta Memorial Hospital | green | “but, by the same token, 'showing a 'unified policy' of violations' is not a hard and fast requirement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.