3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from H.S.P. v. J.K..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | H.S.P. v. J.K. Anchor | green | “by making these preliminary factual findings, the juvenile court is not rendering an immigration determination.” | 4 |
| 2 | In the Interest of J. J. X. C. | green | “the sij statute affirms the institutional competence of state courts as the appropriate forum for child welfare determinations regarding abuse, neglect, or abandonment, and a child's best interests.” | 4 |
| 3 | In the Interest of J. J. X. C. | green | “congress created the sij classification to protect abused, neglected, and abandoned immigrant youth through a process allowing them to become legal permanent citizens.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.