2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. Arizona.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. Arizona Anchor | green | “stop short of those cases in which the harm to the few concerned is thought less important than the harm to the public that would ensue if the rule laid down were made mathematically exact.” | 6 |
| 2 | DeMonaco v. Renton | green | “some substantial consideration of public policy or convenience or the service of the general welfare.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.