2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Califano v. Jobst.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Califano v. Jobst Anchor | green | “is not rendered invalid simply because some persons who might otherwise have married were deterred by the rule or because some who did marry were burdened thereby.” | 8 |
| 2 | Montgomery v. Carr | green | “direct and substantial interference” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.