4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 93 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Watson v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watson v. State Anchor | green | “clearly wrong and manifestly unjust,” | 70 |
| 2 | Roberson v. State | green | “a shorthand way of expressing what must be proven to establish that narcotics were possessed knowingly.” | 10 |
| 3 | Roberson v. State | green | “in such a way that it can be concluded that the accused had knowledge of the contraband and exercised control over it.” | 8 |
| 4 | Roberson v. State | green | “generates a reasonable inference that the accused knew of the contraband's existence and exercised control over it.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.