2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINK.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINK Anchor | green | “a reduction in total benefits due is not the same thing as a reduction in the rate of benefit accrual; the former is the final outcome of the calculation, whereas the latter is one of the factors in the equation.” | 7 |
| 2 | Cooper, Kathi v. IBM Personal Pension | green | “congress set out to legislate against the fact that younger workers have (statistically) more time left before retirement, and thus a greater opportunity to earn interest on each year's retirement savings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.