2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Skoien.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Skoien Anchor | green | “substantially related to an important governmental objective.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Yancey | green | “reserved the question of whether a different kind of firearm regulation might require a different approach.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.