2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James B. Royal v. Leading Edge Products, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James B. Royal v. Leading Edge Products, Inc. Anchor | green | “dismissal can be justified only if it clearly appears that no colorable hook exists upon which subject matter jurisdiction can be hung.” | 7 |
| 2 | Klimowicz v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. | green | “a plaintiff who seeks to bring her suit in a federal forum bears the burden of establishing that the federal court has subject-matter jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.