3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Moore v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moore v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company Anchor | green | “absent a showing tantamount to proof of fraud, an erisa welfare plan is not subject to amendment as a result of informal communications between an employer and plan beneficiaries.” | 4 |
| 2 | Moore v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | green | “an erisa welfare plan is not subject to amendment as a result of informal communications between an employer and plan beneficiaries.” | 3 |
| 3 | Earl Lee and David Abramson v. Richard Burkhart and Patrick Sullivan, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company | green | “the elements of estoppel are (1) material misrepresentation, (2) reliance and (3) damage.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.