Topic: a district court's decision whether to exercise jurisdictio… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #344

4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc. Anchor
scotus · 2009
green “a district court's decision whether to exercise jurisdiction after dismissing every claim over which it had original jurisdiction is purely discretionary.” 47
2 Meredith T. Raney, Jr. v. Allstate Insurance Co.
ca11 · 2004
green “we have encouraged district courts to dismiss any remaining state claims when, as here, the federal claims have been dismissed prior to trial.” 25
3 Susan Doxtator v. Erik O'Brien
ca7 · 2022
green “without any federal claims over which it had original jurisdiction, the district court's decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the pendent state law claims was not an abuse of discretion.” 4
4 Marida Silas v. Sheriff of Broward County, Florida
ca11 · 2022
green “although the district court has discretion, concerns of federalism-namely, of federal courts of limited jurisdiction weighing in on state law-counsel in favor of dismissing state-law claims after the federal claims are dismissed.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check