Topic: where a statute specifically requires exhaustion, the requi… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #34506

3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sokha Sun v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert Coleman, District Director of Ins.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Sokha Sun v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service Robert Coleman, District Director of Ins Anchor
ca9 · 2004
green “where a statute specifically requires exhaustion, the requirement is not excused based merely on a judicial conclusion of futility.” 4
2 Qwest Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, McLeodusa Telecommunications Services, Inc., Intervenors
cadc · 2007
green “afford the commission the initial opportunity to correct errors in its decision or the proceeding leading to decision.” 3
3 Qwest Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, McLeodusa Telecommunications Services, Inc., Intervenors
cadc · 2007
green “one swallow doesn't make a summer.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check