3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tony Cerros v. Steel Technologies, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tony Cerros v. Steel Technologies, Inc. Anchor | green | “falls on the 'more severe' end of the spectrum” | 4 |
| 2 | William R. Hrobowski v. Worthington Steel Company and Worthington Industries, Inc. | green | “can have a highly disturbing impact on the listener.” | 3 |
| 3 | William R. Hrobowski v. Worthington Steel Company and Worthington Industries, Inc. | green | “given american history, we recognize that the word 'nigger' can have a highly disturbing impact on the listener.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.