5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 91 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stewart v. Happy Herman's Cheshire Bridge, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stewart v. Happy Herman's Cheshire Bridge, Inc. Anchor | green | “must view all the evidence and all factual inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,” | 35 |
| 2 | Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc. | green | “contract terms themselves will be controlling when they establish the parties' common meaning so that a reasonable person in the position of either party would have no expectations inconsistent with the contract language.” | 27 |
| 3 | Stewart v. Happy Herman's Cheshire Bridge, Inc. | green | “view all the evidence and all factual inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,” | 18 |
| 4 | Madison Fund, Inc. v. Charter Co. | green | “not entitled to be placed, because of the breach, in a position better than that which they would have occupied had the contract been performed.” | 7 |
| 5 | Continental Insurance v. Rutledge & Co. | green | “not look behind the terms and provisions of a clear and unambigous contract.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.