2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haliw v. City of Sterling Heights Anchor | green | “when called upon to interpret and apply a court rule, this court applies the principles that govern statutory interpretation.” | 5 |
| 2 | Fleet Business Credit, LLC v. Krapohl Ford Lincoln Mercury Co. | green | “court rules should be interpreted to effect the intent of the drafter, the michigan supreme court.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.