4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 91 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore. Anchor | green | “differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefits the former and burdens the latter.” | 61 |
| 2 | Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore. | green | “means differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefits the former and burdens the latter.” | 18 |
| 3 | Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc. | red | “failed to legislate on the subject.” | 7 |
| 4 | C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown | green | “the ordinance is no less discriminatory because in-state or in-town processors are also covered by the prohibition.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.