2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hodnett v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hodnett v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “does not proscribe all seizures, only those that are 'unreasonable.” | 7 |
| 2 | Davis v. Commonwealth | green | “due weight to the inferences drawn from those facts by resident judges and local law enforcement officers.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.