2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Spiegel v. Schulmann.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spiegel v. Schulmann Anchor | green | “n the context of employment discrimination, the retaliation provision of the ada . . . cannot provide for individual liability.” | 4 |
| 2 | J.L. ex rel. J.P. v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ. | green | “there is no individual liability under the ada or 504 of the rehabilitation act.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.