2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pro-Benefit Staffing, Inc. v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pro-Benefit Staffing, Inc. v. Board of Review of the Industrial Commission Anchor | green | “we will not disturb the board's application of its factual findings to the law unless its determination exceeds the bounds of reasonableness and rationality.” | 5 |
| 2 | Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax Commission | green | “when there is a grant of discretion to the agency concerning the language in question, either expressly made in the statute or implied from the statutory language.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.