2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Plantation Pipeline Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Plantation Pipeline Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co. Anchor | green | “the purpose of a notice provision in a policy of insurance is to allow the insurer to investigate promptly the facts surrounding the occurrence and to prepare a defense or determine whether a settlement is feasible, while the facts are still fresh and the witnesses are still ava…” | 7 |
| 2 | Sol Melia, SA v. Brown | green | “this court is for the correction of errors of law, and where the trial court has not ruled on an issue, we will not address it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.