2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maldonado v. Fontanes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maldonado v. Fontanes Anchor | green | “threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” | 4 |
| 2 | MCG v. Hillsborough County School Bd. | green | “the doctrine of res judicata . . . is not applicable where the claims in the two cases concern different periods of time.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.