2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Fab Universal Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Fab Universal Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation Anchor | green | “the doctrine of demand futility, the business judgment rule, and the generally uncertain prospect of establishing a breach of fiduciary duties combine to make shareholder derivative suits an infamously uphill battle for plaintiffs.” | 7 |
| 2 | Maryland Ex Rel. Sachs v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc. | green | “whether the proposed settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.