3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Citizens for a Safe Neighborhood v. City of Seattle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Citizens for a Safe Neighborhood v. City of Seattle Anchor | green | “it is a well established rule of statutory construction that considerable judicial deference should be given to the construction of an ordinance by those officials charged with its enforcement.” | 4 |
| 2 | Samuel's Furniture, Inc. v. Department of Ecology | green | “would not require either a shoreline substantial development permit or a conditional use permit.” | 3 |
| 3 | Vogel v. City of Richland | green | “know whether the decision is objectionable or, if it is, whether there is a viable basis for a challenge.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.