3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of Simmons.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of Simmons Anchor | green | “unless the dominant and significant relationship of another state to the parties and the underlying issue dictates that this basic rule should yield.” | 4 |
| 2 | Gilbert Spruance Co. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n. | green | “dominant significant relationship” | 4 |
| 3 | Johnson Matthey Inc. v. PA. MFRS.'ASS'N INS. CO. | green | “extends to assuring that casualty insurance companies fairly recognize the legal liabilities of their insureds.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.