2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from AJC International, Inc. v. Triple-S Propiedad.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJC International, Inc. v. Triple-S Propiedad Anchor | green | “consider each motion separately, drawing all inferences in favor of each non-moving party in turn.” | 7 |
| 2 | Dan Barclay, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc. | green | “in each instance determine whether the moving party has met its burden under rule 56.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.