2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Sturdivant.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Sturdivant Anchor | green | “e have repeatedly held that a lawenforcement agent may ac tively mislead a defendant in order to obtain a confession, so long as a rational decision remains possible.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Roger Rutledge | green | “the law permits the police to pressure and cajole, con ceal material facts, and actively mislead-all up to limits not exceeded here” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.