2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Faircloth v. Lyles.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Faircloth v. Lyles Anchor | green | “arbitrary, capricious, discriminatory, or is illegal, or without a substantial evidentiary basis.” | 6 |
| 2 | Town of Florence v. Sea Lands, Ltd. | green | “it is impossible to articulate or design a particular test for determining what is sufficient evidence to show a material change and a public need to support rezoning.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.