3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Virgil Johnson and Virgil Johnson Trucking v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Virgil Johnson and Virgil Johnson Trucking v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. Anchor | green | “summary judgment is proper if the only issue is the legal consequences flowing from undisputed facts.” | 4 |
| 2 | Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. State, Department of Human Services | green | “the proper vehicle to test the validity of the claims . . . and we need only decide whether the district court properly applied the law.” | 3 |
| 3 | Virgil Johnson and Virgil Johnson Trucking v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. | green | “the proper vehicle to test the validity of the claims . . . and we need only decide whether the district court properly applied the law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.