3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Geisinger Clinic v. Di Cuccio.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geisinger Clinic v. Di Cuccio Anchor | green | “if the promise is entirely optional with the promisor, it is said to be illusory and, therefore, lacking consideration and unenforceable. the promisor has committed him/herself to nothing.” | 4 |
| 2 | D.A. Hill Co. v. Clevetrust Realty Investors | green | “(1) an enrichment, and (2) an injustice resulting if recovery for the enrichment is denied.” | 3 |
| 3 | Burgettstown-Smith Township Joint Sewage Authority v. Langeloth Townsite Co. | green | “the most significant requirement for recovery is that the enrichment is unjust. we must focus not on the intention of the parties but on the extent to which the enrichment is unjust.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.