2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of Iran.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of Iran Anchor | green | “sufficiently outrageous and intended to inflict severe emotional harm upon a person who is not present,” | 6 |
| 2 | Kaplan v. Hezbollah | green | “failed to meet the minimum evidentiary threshold supporting their respective claims for economic damages,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.