2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Jordan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Jordan Anchor | green | “we review the district court's factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard and the district court's legal determinations de novo.” | 6 |
| 2 | State v. Kvam | green | “reaches the firm conviction that a mistake was made.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.