2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trippe Manufacturing Company v. American Power Conversion Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trippe Manufacturing Company v. American Power Conversion Corporation Anchor | green | “his circuit does not rigidly adhere to a 'first-to-file' rule” | 4 |
| 2 | Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc. | green | “he proposed classes for the collective actions are substantially similar in that both classes seek to represent at least some of the same individuals.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.