2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alvarez v. American Isuzu Motors.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alvarez v. American Isuzu Motors Anchor | green | “fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used.” | 7 |
| 2 | Lara v. Hyundai Motor America | green | “a remedy limitation fails of its essential purpose when a seller unreasonably delays the replacement of the product, refuses to replace it at all, or is unsuccessful in correcting the defects 'within a reasonable time.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.