3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 90 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Romero-Barcelo v. Hernandez-Agosto.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Romero-Barcelo v. Hernandez-Agosto Anchor | green | “factual allegations, either direct or inferential, regarding each material element necessary to sustain recovery under some actionable theory.” | 41 |
| 2 | Alan Aulson Et Ux. Maureen Aulson v. Charles Blanchard | green | “all well-pleaded factual averments and indulge all reasonable inferences in the plaintiffs favor.” | 25 |
| 3 | Abbott v. United States | green | “bald assertions' or legal conclusions” | 24 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.