2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fischer v. Heymann.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fischer v. Heymann Anchor | green | “so as not to render any words, phrases, or terms ineffective or meaningless.” | 7 |
| 2 | Beatty v. LaFountaine | green | “guesses, supposition and conjecture are not sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact to defeat summary judgment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.