3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Prichep v. Prichep.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prichep v. Prichep Anchor | green | “will generally be warranted where there is a significant disparity in the financial circumstances of the parties” | 4 |
| 2 | O'Shea v. O'Shea | green | “redress the economic disparity between the monied spouse and the non-monied spouse” | 3 |
| 3 | Prichep v. Prichep | green | “as, in the court's discretion, justice requires, having regard to the circumstances of the case and of the respective parties” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.