3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Suazo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Suazo Anchor | green | “assent . . . is meaningless unless the consenting party understood his or her right to refuse” | 4 |
| 2 | State V.charles Bryant,jr.(075958)(middlesex County and Statewide) | green | “indeed, 'we accord the highest degree of protection to privacy interests within the home' . . . because 'the sanctity of one's home is among our most cherished rights.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. James Legette076124) | green | “the state's burden is particularly heavy when the search is conducted after warrantless entry into a home.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.