3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In the Matter of Submission Clause for 2009-2010 No. 45.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the Matter of Submission Clause for 2009-2010 No. 45 Anchor | green | “insufficient, unfair, or misleading.” | 4 |
| 2 | In the Matter of Submission Clause for 2009-2010 No. 45 | green | “we employ all legitimate presumptions in favor of the propriety of the title board's actions.” | 3 |
| 3 | Outcelt v. Bruce | green | “convey to voters the initiative's likely impact.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.